Pro-family arguments at Supreme Court “gay marriage” hearing very frustrating, non-aggressive.

Playing to “conventional wisdom” that has not worked so far.

Hope that Justices aren’t eager to radically change America. Entire case lacks legal legitimacy.

POSTED: May 1, 2015

“GEORGE ORWELL said that we live in a time when the obvious needs constantly to be restated, and so, to restate what was once self-evident to everyone, including most homosexuals themselves: men using one another as women constitutes a perversion. To my unreconstructed mind, this is as true as ever; and so far as I am concerned, it would still be true even if gay sex no longer entailed the danger of infection and even if everything about it were legalized by all 50 states and ratified by all nine Justices of the Supreme Court.”

– Norman Podhoretz, Commentary Magazine, 1996

On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 the nine US Supreme Court Justices heard arguments and questioned the lawyers on both sides of the “gay marriage” issue. (See our previous article, “Ten things you need to know about the Supreme Court ‘gay marriage’ case.”) Sadly, this was an eye-opener into how distorted our judicial system has become.

Telling it like it is in D.C..

via Pro-family arguments at Supreme Court “gay marriage” hearing very frustrating, non-aggressive..